Head to head · 2026 World Series batting
Jake Bauers vs Richie Palacios
In 2026 Jake Bauers has been worth 2.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | 3 |
| PA | 24 | 10 |
| H | 2 | 0 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 0 |
| BB | 3 | 0 |
| SO | 6 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .095 | .000 |
| OBP | .208 | .000 |
| SLG | .095 | .000 |
| OPS | .304 | .000 |
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 21 | 10 |
| PA | 78 | 32 |
| H | 15 | 8 |
| HR | 3 | 0 |
| RBI | 10 | 4 |
| BB | 11 | 0 |
| SO | 25 | 8 |
| SB | 1 | 1 |
| AVG | .227 | .258 |
| OBP | .346 | .258 |
| SLG | .394 | .355 |
| OPS | .740 | .613 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 144 | 122 |
| PA | 578 | 399 |
| H | 127 | 81 |
| HR | 26 | 10 |
| RBI | 86 | 57 |
| SB | 11 | 17 |
| AVG | .266 | .235 |
| OBP | .389 | .330 |
| SLG | .484 | .374 |
| OPS | .874 | .704 |
| ISO | .218 | .139 |
| BB% | 16.3% | 11.5% |
| K% | 27.0% | 17.0% |
| wOBA | .384 | .319 |
| wRC+ | 145 | 100 |
| WAR | 4.4 | 1.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 743 | 313 |
| PA | 2,540 | 988 |
| H | 487 | 204 |
| 2B | 100 | 36 |
| 3B | 7 | 3 |
| HR | 84 | 22 |
| RBI | 297 | 107 |
| BB | 321 | 111 |
| SO | 725 | 175 |
| SB | 50 | 44 |
| AVG | .223 | .238 |
| SLG | .391 | .364 |
| WAR | 6.2 | 3.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

