Head to head · 2026 World Series batting
Richie Palacios vs Brice Turang
In 2026 Brice Turang has been worth 3.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Richie Palacios | Brice Turang |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 5 |
| PA | 10 | 23 |
| H | 0 | 6 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 0 | 4 |
| SO | 3 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .000 | .316 |
| OBP | .000 | .435 |
| SLG | .000 | .474 |
| OPS | .000 | .908 |
| Statistic | Richie Palacios | Brice Turang |
|---|---|---|
| G | 10 | 27 |
| PA | 32 | 112 |
| H | 8 | 21 |
| HR | 0 | 2 |
| RBI | 4 | 7 |
| BB | 0 | 15 |
| SO | 8 | 27 |
| SB | 1 | 4 |
| AVG | .258 | .221 |
| OBP | .258 | .327 |
| SLG | .355 | .368 |
| OPS | .613 | .696 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Richie Palacios | Brice Turang |
|---|---|---|
| G | 122 | 150 |
| PA | 399 | 680 |
| H | 81 | 157 |
| HR | 10 | 21 |
| RBI | 57 | 101 |
| SB | 17 | 19 |
| AVG | .235 | .270 |
| OBP | .330 | .367 |
| SLG | .374 | .452 |
| OPS | .704 | .819 |
| ISO | .139 | .182 |
| BB% | 11.5% | 13.2% |
| K% | 17.0% | 25.1% |
| wOBA | .319 | .362 |
| wRC+ | 100 | 130 |
| WAR | 1.7 | 5.5 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Richie Palacios | Brice Turang |
|---|---|---|
| G | 313 | 587 |
| PA | 988 | 2,406 |
| H | 204 | 555 |
| 2B | 36 | 98 |
| 3B | 3 | 12 |
| HR | 22 | 52 |
| RBI | 107 | 273 |
| BB | 111 | 244 |
| SO | 175 | 520 |
| SB | 44 | 119 |
| AVG | .238 | .261 |
| SLG | .364 | .391 |
| WAR | 3.6 | 13.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

