Head to head · 2026 pitching
Cristopher Sánchez vs Paul Skenes
In 2026 Cristopher Sánchez has been worth 2.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Both among the 25 most valuable pitchers of 2026 by dbWAR.
- Both near the front of the 2026 NL Cy Young race: among the league's 8 most valuable pitchers by dbWAR.
- Both among the 25 most valuable pitchers of 2025 by dbWAR.
- Both near the front of the 2025 NL Cy Young race: among the league's 8 most valuable pitchers by dbWAR.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Cristopher Sánchez | Paul Skenes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 33 | 32 |
| GS | 33 | 32 |
| IP | 207.0 | 174.1 |
| W | 18 | 10 |
| SO | 231 | 200 |
| ERA | 2.91 | 3.82 |
| FIP | 2.80 | 3.33 |
| WHIP | 1.20 | 1.12 |
| K/9 | 10.0 | 10.3 |
| BB/9 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
| FIP− | 67 | 80 |
| WAR | 6.1 | 4.0 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Cristopher Sánchez | Paul Skenes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 5 | — |
| GS | 5 | — |
| IP | 26.0 | — |
| W | 0 | — |
| SV | 0 | — |
| SO | 25 | — |
| BB | 10 | — |
| ERA | 3.12 | — |
| WHIP | 1.23 | — |
| K/9 | 8.7 | — |
| BB/9 | 3.5 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cristopher Sánchez | Paul Skenes |
|---|---|---|
| G | 137 | 87 |
| GS | 118 | 87 |
| IP | 742.2 | 495.0 |
| W | 48 | 31 |
| L | 28 | 24 |
| SV | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 740 | 586 |
| BB | 173 | 123 |
| ERA | 3.15 | 2.62 |
| WHIP | 1.17 | 1.01 |
| K/9 | 9.0 | 10.7 |
| BB/9 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| HR/9 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| WAR | 18.8 | 14.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.