Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt Chapman vs Wyatt Langford

So far in 2026 Wyatt Langford has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt Chapman SF

Wyatt Langford TEX

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Wyatt Langford
G	84	103
PA	352	442
H	72	94
HR	7	17
RBI	42	42
SB	0	15
AVG	.235	.244
OBP	.324	.339
SLG	.368	.438
OPS	.692	.777
ISO	.134	.194
BB%	10.5%	11.8%
K%	23.0%	21.9%
wOBA	.311	.344
wRC+	96	121
WAR	1.1	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt Chapman	Wyatt Langford
G	1,226	370
PA	5,122	1,572
H	1,073	338
2B	271	70
3B	24	7
HR	210	55
RBI	607	178
BB	553	177
SO	1,341	363
SB	35	56
AVG	.240	.246
SLG	.452	.427
WAR	28.3	7.5

Matt Chapman’s full profile →Wyatt Langford’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt Chapman vs

Wyatt Langford vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.