Head to head · 2026 pitching

Logan Webb vs Yoshinobu Yamamoto

In 2026 Yoshinobu Yamamoto has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Both among the 25 most valuable pitchers of 2025 by dbWAR.
Both near the front of the 2025 NL Cy Young race: among the league's 8 most valuable pitchers by dbWAR.

Logan Webb SF

Yoshinobu Yamamoto LAD

2026 season

2026 pitching. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for ERA, FIP, WHIP and walks that is the lower one.
Statistic	Logan Webb	Yoshinobu Yamamoto
G	27	28
GS	27	28
IP	160.2	185.0
W	8	14
SO	134	182
ERA	4.31	2.53
FIP	3.46	3.34
WHIP	1.17	0.87
K/9	7.5	8.9
BB/9	2.3	2.0
FIP−	83	80
WAR	3.2	4.1

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, pitching, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Logan Webb	Yoshinobu Yamamoto
G	2	12
GS	2	11
IP	14.2	65.2
W	1	8
SV	0	0
SO	17	59
BB	1	15
ERA	0.61	2.47
WHIP	0.68	0.88
K/9	10.4	8.1
BB/9	0.6	2.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career pitching totals. ERA, WHIP and the per-nine rates are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; FIP needs each season’s own constant and is left to the season table.
Statistic	Logan Webb	Yoshinobu Yamamoto
G	207	76
GS	204	76
IP	1,223.0	448.2
W	78	33
L	62	19
SV	0	0
SO	1,128	488
BB	291	123
ERA	3.50	2.61
WHIP	1.19	0.97
K/9	8.3	9.8
BB/9	2.1	2.5
HR/9	0.6	0.8
WAR	30.1	11.4

Logan Webb’s full profile →Yoshinobu Yamamoto’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Logan Webb vs

Yoshinobu Yamamoto vs

How these are computed

FIP uses the constant solved from this season’s own runs, and FIP− is park-adjusted against the same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.