Head to head · 2026 batting

Ronald Acuña Jr. vs George Springer

In 2026 Ronald Acuña Jr. has been worth 1.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Ronald Acuña Jr.ATL

George Springer TOR

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ronald Acuña Jr.	George Springer
G	107	125
PA	469	517
H	104	115
HR	20	15
RBI	55	54
SB	21	12
AVG	.255	.249
OBP	.345	.321
SLG	.451	.405
OPS	.796	.726
ISO	.196	.156
BB%	11.3%	9.1%
K%	22.0%	18.4%
wOBA	.350	.323
wRC+	120	103
WAR	2.3	0.7

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Ronald Acuña Jr.	George Springer
G	36	83
PA	158	384
H	31	93
HR	3	23
RBI	9	48
BB	20	36
SO	40	91
SB	8	4
AVG	.233	.271
OBP	.354	.346
SLG	.391	.534
OPS	.745	.880

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Ronald Acuña Jr.	George Springer
G	924	1,564
PA	4,135	6,892
H	1,017	1,595
2B	175	272
3B	14	25
HR	206	308
RBI	514	850
BB	492	723
SO	924	1,410
SB	226	132
AVG	.285	.265
SLG	.516	.472
WAR	34.4	37.8

Ronald Acuña Jr.’s full profile →George Springer’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ronald Acuña Jr. vs

George Springer vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.