Head to head · 2026 batting
Cal Raleigh vs Austin Wells
In 2026 Cal Raleigh has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | Austin Wells |
|---|---|---|
| G | 126 | 121 |
| PA | 530 | 388 |
| H | 82 | 62 |
| HR | 23 | 14 |
| RBI | 69 | 32 |
| SB | 2 | 4 |
| AVG | .182 | .186 |
| OBP | .296 | .292 |
| SLG | .368 | .332 |
| OPS | .664 | .624 |
| ISO | .186 | .147 |
| BB% | 13.6% | 12.4% |
| K% | 30.9% | 26.5% |
| wOBA | .299 | .284 |
| wRC+ | 90 | 73 |
| WAR | 1.5 | 0.5 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cal Raleigh | Austin Wells |
|---|---|---|
| G | 744 | 370 |
| PA | 2,995 | 1,325 |
| H | 571 | 247 |
| 2B | 110 | 53 |
| 3B | 2 | 2 |
| HR | 176 | 52 |
| RBI | 445 | 171 |
| BB | 338 | 128 |
| SO | 860 | 322 |
| SB | 23 | 10 |
| AVG | .218 | .213 |
| SLG | .464 | .397 |
| WAR | 18.8 | 4.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

