DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 batting

Cal Raleigh vs Austin Wells

In 2026 Cal Raleigh has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
StatisticCal RaleighAustin Wells
G126121
PA530388
H8262
HR2314
RBI6932
SB24
AVG.182.186
OBP.296.292
SLG.368.332
OPS.664.624
ISO.186.147
BB%13.6%12.4%
K%30.9%26.5%
wOBA.299.284
wRC+9073
WAR1.50.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
StatisticCal RaleighAustin Wells
G744370
PA2,9951,325
H571247
2B11053
3B22
HR17652
RBI445171
BB338128
SO860322
SB2310
AVG.218.213
SLG.464.397
WAR18.84.6

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.