Head to head · 2026 batting

Trent Grisham vs Trea Turner

So far in 2026 Trea Turner has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Grisham NYY

Trea Turner PHI

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Trea Turner
G	120	150
PA	484	668
H	88	148
HR	18	19
RBI	59	57
SB	9	21
AVG	.211	.241
OBP	.308	.296
SLG	.395	.380
OPS	.703	.677
ISO	.184	.140
BB%	12.6%	6.9%
K%	18.4%	21.0%
wOBA	.314	.300
wRC+	93	83
WAR	1.6	2.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Trea Turner
G	861	1,409
PA	3,315	6,274
H	616	1,679
2B	125	309
3B	14	49
HR	122	205
RBI	379	698
BB	402	429
SO	818	1,168
SB	59	336
AVG	.217	.291
SLG	.399	.468
WAR	13.9	49.5

Trent Grisham’s full profile →Trea Turner’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Grisham vs

Trea Turner vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.