Head to head · 2026 batting

Trent Grisham vs José Ramírez

So far in 2026 José Ramírez has been worth 0.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Grisham NYY

José Ramírez CLE

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	José Ramírez
G	120	118
PA	484	516
H	88	105
HR	18	12
RBI	59	51
SB	9	34
AVG	.211	.234
OBP	.308	.322
SLG	.395	.373
OPS	.703	.695
ISO	.184	.138
BB%	12.6%	11.2%
K%	18.4%	13.0%
wOBA	.314	.306
wRC+	93	90
WAR	1.6	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	José Ramírez
G	861	1,634
PA	3,315	6,995
H	616	1,707
2B	125	414
3B	14	40
HR	122	295
RBI	379	983
BB	402	709
SO	818	832
SB	59	311
AVG	.217	.277
SLG	.399	.500
WAR	13.9	54.2

Trent Grisham’s full profile →José Ramírez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Grisham vs

José Ramírez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.