Head to head · 2026 batting

Michael Harris II vs Mike Trout

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 4.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Michael Harris II ATL

Mike Trout LAA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Mike Trout
G	155	142
PA	621	634
H	174	124
HR	26	22
RBI	87	54
SB	12	11
AVG	.294	.242
OBP	.321	.382
SLG	.491	.421
OPS	.812	.803
ISO	.196	.179
BB%	3.7%	16.9%
K%	19.2%	26.0%
wOBA	.350	.358
wRC+	120	134
WAR	4.4	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Mike Trout
G	676	1,297
PA	2,712	5,642
H	713	1,306
2B	136	240
3B	16	29
HR	99	328
RBI	342	765
BB	108	905
SO	549	1,339
SB	82	123
AVG	.278	.283
SLG	.460	.562
WAR	16.3	63.8

Michael Harris II’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Michael Harris II vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.