Head to head · 2026 batting

Matt McLain vs Parker Meadows

So far in 2026 Matt McLain has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Matt McLain CIN

Parker Meadows DET

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Matt McLain	Parker Meadows
G	124	12
PA	474	39
H	76	9
HR	15	0
RBI	39	2
SB	18	3
AVG	.183	.250
OBP	.274	.308
SLG	.334	.333
OPS	.608	.641
ISO	.151	.083
BB%	9.9%	5.1%
K%	28.1%	25.6%
wOBA	.275	.291
wRC+	72	82
WAR	0.7	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Matt McLain	Parker Meadows
G	357	182
PA	1,454	695
H	294	145
2B	59	23
3B	4	11
HR	46	16
RBI	139	59
BB	133	65
SO	415	179
SB	50	24
AVG	.228	.233
SLG	.387	.383
WAR	5.6	2.6

Matt McLain’s full profile →Parker Meadows’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Matt McLain vs

Parker Meadows vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.