Head to head · 2026 batting
Parker Meadows vs Daniel Schneemann
In 2026 the two have been worth the same 0.1 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Parker Meadows | Daniel Schneemann |
|---|---|---|
| G | 12 | 88 |
| PA | 39 | 286 |
| H | 9 | 55 |
| HR | 0 | 7 |
| RBI | 2 | 30 |
| SB | 3 | 7 |
| AVG | .250 | .210 |
| OBP | .308 | .276 |
| SLG | .333 | .332 |
| OPS | .641 | .608 |
| ISO | .083 | .122 |
| BB% | 5.1% | 8.4% |
| K% | 25.6% | 29.4% |
| wOBA | .291 | .274 |
| wRC+ | 83 | 68 |
| WAR | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Parker Meadows | Daniel Schneemann |
|---|---|---|
| G | 15 | 5 |
| PA | 61 | 10 |
| H | 11 | 1 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 1 | 1 |
| BB | 4 | 0 |
| SO | 16 | 3 |
| SB | 3 | 0 |
| AVG | .200 | .100 |
| OBP | .254 | .100 |
| SLG | .291 | .200 |
| OPS | .545 | .300 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Parker Meadows | Daniel Schneemann |
|---|---|---|
| G | 182 | 288 |
| PA | 695 | 929 |
| H | 145 | 175 |
| 2B | 23 | 39 |
| 3B | 11 | 3 |
| HR | 16 | 24 |
| RBI | 59 | 93 |
| BB | 65 | 87 |
| SO | 179 | 271 |
| SB | 24 | 19 |
| AVG | .233 | .210 |
| SLG | .383 | .350 |
| WAR | 2.6 | 1.5 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.