Head to head · 2026 ALCS batting
Steven Kwan vs Richie Palacios
In 2026 Steven Kwan has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Steven Kwan | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 6 | 4 |
| PA | 27 | 12 |
| H | 7 | 6 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 1 | 0 |
| SO | 2 | 2 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .269 | .500 |
| OBP | .296 | .500 |
| SLG | .269 | .667 |
| OPS | .566 | 1.167 |
| Statistic | Steven Kwan | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 31 | 10 |
| PA | 142 | 32 |
| H | 38 | 8 |
| HR | 1 | 0 |
| RBI | 5 | 4 |
| BB | 13 | 0 |
| SO | 10 | 8 |
| SB | 3 | 1 |
| AVG | .295 | .258 |
| OBP | .359 | .258 |
| SLG | .349 | .355 |
| OPS | .708 | .613 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Steven Kwan | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 150 | 122 |
| PA | 637 | 399 |
| H | 152 | 81 |
| HR | 3 | 10 |
| RBI | 32 | 57 |
| SB | 10 | 17 |
| AVG | .282 | .235 |
| OBP | .382 | .330 |
| SLG | .349 | .374 |
| OPS | .731 | .704 |
| ISO | .067 | .139 |
| BB% | 13.3% | 11.5% |
| K% | 9.7% | 17.0% |
| wOBA | .338 | .319 |
| wRC+ | 112 | 100 |
| WAR | 2.8 | 1.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Steven Kwan | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 732 | 313 |
| PA | 3,226 | 988 |
| H | 801 | 204 |
| 2B | 127 | 36 |
| 3B | 21 | 3 |
| HR | 39 | 22 |
| RBI | 238 | 107 |
| BB | 325 | 111 |
| SO | 308 | 175 |
| SB | 83 | 44 |
| AVG | .282 | .238 |
| SLG | .382 | .364 |
| WAR | 13.0 | 3.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

