Head to head · 2026 batting

Luisangel Acuña vs Victor Scott II

In 2026 the two have been worth the same -0.4 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Luisangel Acuña CWS

Victor Scott II STL

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luisangel Acuña	Victor Scott II
G	87	68
PA	224	195
H	48	32
HR	2	2
RBI	13	9
SB	18	12
AVG	.229	.193
OBP	.261	.270
SLG	.276	.253
OPS	.537	.523
ISO	.048	.060
BB%	4.0%	8.2%
K%	19.6%	23.6%
wOBA	.243	.245
wRC+	48	51
WAR	-0.4	-0.4

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Luisangel Acuña	Victor Scott II
G	4	—
PA	4	—
H	0	—
HR	0	—
RBI	0	—
BB	0	—
SO	2	—
SB	2	—
AVG	.000	—
OBP	.000	—
SLG	.000	—
OPS	.000	—

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Luisangel Acuña	Victor Scott II
G	176	246
PA	457	813
H	101	144
2B	13	28
3B	1	1
HR	5	9
RBI	27	56
BB	23	64
SO	87	199
SB	34	51
AVG	.238	.203
SLG	.309	.283
WAR	0.1	0.1

Luisangel Acuña’s full profile →Victor Scott II’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luisangel Acuña vs

Victor Scott II vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.