Head to head · 2026 batting

Elly De La Cruz vs Trent Grisham

So far in 2026 Elly De La Cruz has been worth 4.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Elly De La Cruz CIN

Trent Grisham NYY

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Elly De La Cruz	Trent Grisham
G	136	120
PA	605	484
H	152	88
HR	28	18
RBI	74	59
SB	27	9
AVG	.286	.211
OBP	.367	.308
SLG	.517	.395
OPS	.884	.703
ISO	.231	.184
BB%	11.2%	12.6%
K%	27.4%	18.4%
wOBA	.384	.314
wRC+	150	93
WAR	6.5	1.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Elly De La Cruz	Trent Grisham
G	556	861
PA	2,427	3,315
H	569	616
2B	111	125
3B	29	14
HR	88	122
RBI	280	379
BB	239	402
SO	709	818
SB	166	59
AVG	.263	.217
SLG	.462	.399
WAR	19.3	13.9

Elly De La Cruz’s full profile →Trent Grisham’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Elly De La Cruz vs

Trent Grisham vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.