Head to head · 2026 batting
Elly De La Cruz vs Trent Grisham
In 2026 Elly De La Cruz has been worth 5.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
2026 season
| Statistic | Elly De La Cruz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 143 | 120 |
| PA | 636 | 484 |
| H | 158 | 88 |
| HR | 30 | 18 |
| RBI | 79 | 59 |
| SB | 30 | 9 |
| AVG | .283 | .211 |
| OBP | .365 | .308 |
| SLG | .515 | .395 |
| OPS | .880 | .703 |
| ISO | .233 | .184 |
| BB% | 11.3% | 12.6% |
| K% | 27.5% | 18.4% |
| wOBA | .382 | .314 |
| wRC+ | 148 | 93 |
| WAR | 6.7 | 1.6 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Elly De La Cruz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2 | 31 |
| PA | 8 | 125 |
| H | 0 | 17 |
| HR | 0 | 3 |
| RBI | 2 | 7 |
| BB | 2 | 13 |
| SO | 4 | 43 |
| SB | 0 | 2 |
| AVG | .000 | .156 |
| OBP | .250 | .264 |
| SLG | .000 | .266 |
| OPS | .250 | .530 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Elly De La Cruz | Trent Grisham |
|---|---|---|
| G | 563 | 861 |
| PA | 2,458 | 3,315 |
| H | 575 | 616 |
| 2B | 112 | 125 |
| 3B | 29 | 14 |
| HR | 90 | 122 |
| RBI | 285 | 379 |
| BB | 243 | 402 |
| SO | 718 | 818 |
| SB | 169 | 59 |
| AVG | .262 | .217 |
| SLG | .463 | .399 |
| WAR | 19.5 | 13.9 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.