Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Jake Bauers

In 2026 CJ Abrams has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Jake Bauers MIL

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Jake Bauers
G	152	144
PA	654	578
H	151	127
HR	33	26
RBI	106	86
SB	34	11
AVG	.261	.266
OBP	.336	.389
SLG	.497	.484
OPS	.834	.874
ISO	.237	.218
BB%	8.7%	16.3%
K%	24.2%	27.0%
wOBA	.359	.384
wRC+	123	145
WAR	5.3	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Jake Bauers
G	673	743
PA	2,807	2,540
H	641	487
2B	134	100
3B	23	7
HR	92	84
RBI	316	297
BB	171	321
SO	579	725
SB	150	50
AVG	.252	.223
SLG	.431	.391
WAR	17.0	6.2

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Jake Bauers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Jake Bauers vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.