Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Zach Neto

So far in 2026 CJ Abrams has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Zach Neto LAA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Zach Neto
G	145	150
PA	627	672
H	145	142
HR	30	26
RBI	97	74
SB	32	21
AVG	.261	.239
OBP	.337	.324
SLG	.488	.435
OPS	.825	.760
ISO	.227	.197
BB%	8.6%	9.2%
K%	24.1%	30.8%
wOBA	.356	.335
wRC+	121	117
WAR	4.9	4.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Zach Neto
G	666	515
PA	2,780	2,157
H	635	471
2B	134	109
3B	22	7
HR	89	84
RBI	307	247
BB	168	154
SO	572	573
SB	148	82
AVG	.252	.244
SLG	.428	.439
WAR	16.6	13.2

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Zach Neto’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Zach Neto vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.