Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Zach Neto

In 2026 CJ Abrams has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Zach Neto LAA

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Zach Neto
G	152	157
PA	654	704
H	151	148
HR	33	27
RBI	106	77
SB	34	24
AVG	.261	.239
OBP	.336	.330
SLG	.497	.436
OPS	.834	.766
ISO	.237	.197
BB%	8.7%	9.9%
K%	24.2%	30.5%
wOBA	.359	.339
wRC+	123	120
WAR	5.3	4.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Zach Neto
G	673	522
PA	2,807	2,189
H	641	477
2B	134	111
3B	23	7
HR	92	85
RBI	316	250
BB	171	162
SO	579	581
SB	150	85
AVG	.252	.244
SLG	.431	.439
WAR	17.0	13.7

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Zach Neto’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Zach Neto vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.