Head to head · 2026 batting

Zach Neto vs Mike Trout

In 2026 Zach Neto has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Zach Neto LAA

Mike Trout LAA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Zach Neto	Mike Trout
G	157	142
PA	704	634
H	148	124
HR	27	22
RBI	77	54
SB	24	11
AVG	.239	.242
OBP	.330	.382
SLG	.436	.421
OPS	.766	.803
ISO	.197	.179
BB%	9.9%	16.9%
K%	30.5%	26.0%
wOBA	.339	.358
wRC+	120	134
WAR	4.7	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Zach Neto	Mike Trout
G	522	1,297
PA	2,189	5,642
H	477	1,306
2B	111	240
3B	7	29
HR	85	328
RBI	250	765
BB	162	905
SO	581	1,339
SB	85	123
AVG	.244	.283
SLG	.439	.562
WAR	13.7	63.8

Zach Neto’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Zach Neto vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.