Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Manzardo vs James McCann

So far in 2026 James McCann has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Manzardo CLE

James McCann AZ

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Manzardo	James McCann
G	102	44
PA	356	152
H	67	40
HR	13	5
RBI	39	24
SB	0	0
AVG	.215	.282
OBP	.306	.313
SLG	.378	.430
OPS	.684	.743
ISO	.163	.148
BB%	10.1%	3.9%
K%	32.0%	25.7%
wOBA	.308	.324
wRC+	91	104
WAR	0.2	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Manzardo	James McCann
G	296	971
PA	1,043	3,584
H	211	802
2B	41	139
3B	3	10
HR	45	102
RBI	124	414
BB	93	208
SO	290	917
SB	2	14
AVG	.228	.243
SLG	.424	.385
WAR	1.4	8.1

Kyle Manzardo’s full profile →James McCann’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Manzardo vs

James McCann vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.