Head to head · 2026 batting

Luke Keaschall vs Trea Turner

So far in 2026 Luke Keaschall has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Luke Keaschall MIN

Trea Turner PHI

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Trea Turner
G	146	150
PA	594	668
H	141	148
HR	9	19
RBI	46	57
SB	19	21
AVG	.278	.241
OBP	.370	.296
SLG	.387	.380
OPS	.757	.677
ISO	.108	.140
BB%	9.4%	6.9%
K%	14.3%	21.0%
wOBA	.343	.300
wRC+	119	83
WAR	3.3	2.2

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Trea Turner
G	195	1,409
PA	801	6,274
H	196	1,679
2B	40	309
3B	1	49
HR	13	205
RBI	74	698
BB	75	429
SO	114	1,168
SB	33	336
AVG	.284	.291
SLG	.402	.468
WAR	5.1	49.5

Luke Keaschall’s full profile →Trea Turner’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luke Keaschall vs

Trea Turner vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.