Head to head · Career batting

Nolan Arenado vs Francisco Lindor

In 2026 Nolan Arenado has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.

Nolan Arenado AZ

Francisco Lindor NYM

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Nolan Arenado	Francisco Lindor
G	1,936	1,639
PA	8,113	7,317
H	2,057	1,758
2B	430	351
3B	35	30
HR	383	300
RBI	1,270	905
BB	629	634
SO	1,214	1,215
SB	35	219
AVG	.280	.270
SLG	.505	.472
WAR	50.5	54.8

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Nolan Arenado	Francisco Lindor
G	152	104
PA	599	469
H	136	94
HR	30	21
RBI	86	49
SB	4	3
AVG	.255	.225
OBP	.331	.309
SLG	.475	.423
OPS	.806	.733
ISO	.220	.199
BB%	8.7%	9.8%
K%	20.0%	20.3%
wOBA	.350	.324
wRC+	123	105
WAR	3.9	2.5

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Nolan Arenado	Francisco Lindor
G	8	41
PA	35	179
H	5	41
HR	1	8
RBI	3	21
BB	0	20
SO	9	42
SB	0	2
AVG	.152	.263
OBP	.143	.348
SLG	.242	.474
OPS	.385	.823

Nolan Arenado’s full profile →Francisco Lindor’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Nolan Arenado vs

Francisco Lindor vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.