Head to head · 2026 batting
Francisco Lindor vs Manny Machado
In 2026 Francisco Lindor has been worth 0.8 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
- Two of the 25 most valuable batting careers on this site, 2005–2026, by dbWAR.
2026 season
| Statistic | Francisco Lindor | Manny Machado |
|---|---|---|
| G | 104 | 158 |
| PA | 469 | 677 |
| H | 94 | 128 |
| HR | 21 | 30 |
| RBI | 49 | 91 |
| SB | 3 | 5 |
| AVG | .225 | .217 |
| OBP | .309 | .303 |
| SLG | .423 | .407 |
| OPS | .733 | .711 |
| ISO | .199 | .190 |
| BB% | 9.8% | 11.2% |
| K% | 20.3% | 21.3% |
| wOBA | .324 | .312 |
| wRC+ | 105 | 99 |
| WAR | 2.5 | 1.7 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Francisco Lindor | Manny Machado |
|---|---|---|
| G | 41 | 57 |
| PA | 179 | 243 |
| H | 41 | 49 |
| HR | 8 | 13 |
| RBI | 21 | 32 |
| BB | 20 | 18 |
| SO | 42 | 60 |
| SB | 2 | 1 |
| AVG | .263 | .222 |
| OBP | .348 | .282 |
| SLG | .474 | .439 |
| OPS | .823 | .721 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Francisco Lindor | Manny Machado |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1,639 | 2,052 |
| PA | 7,317 | 8,872 |
| H | 1,758 | 2,197 |
| 2B | 351 | 418 |
| 3B | 30 | 18 |
| HR | 300 | 399 |
| RBI | 905 | 1,235 |
| BB | 634 | 739 |
| SO | 1,215 | 1,577 |
| SB | 219 | 118 |
| AVG | .270 | .274 |
| SLG | .472 | .480 |
| WAR | 54.8 | 52.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

