Head to head · 2026 batting

Francisco Lindor vs Luis Robert Jr.

In 2026 Francisco Lindor has been worth 1.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Francisco Lindor NYM

Luis Robert Jr.NYM

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Luis Robert Jr.
G	104	60
PA	469	230
H	94	45
HR	21	11
RBI	49	26
SB	3	2
AVG	.225	.221
OBP	.309	.300
SLG	.423	.407
OPS	.733	.707
ISO	.199	.186
BB%	9.8%	10.4%
K%	20.3%	23.9%
wOBA	.324	.312
wRC+	105	97
WAR	2.5	0.6

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Luis Robert Jr.
G	41	7
PA	179	31
H	41	11
HR	8	1
RBI	21	3
BB	20	2
SO	42	6
SB	2	0
AVG	.263	.393
OBP	.348	.452
SLG	.474	.500
OPS	.823	.952

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Luis Robert Jr.
G	1,639	628
PA	7,317	2,605
H	1,758	610
2B	351	120
3B	30	2
HR	300	113
RBI	905	324
BB	634	173
SO	1,215	691
SB	219	104
AVG	.270	.256
SLG	.472	.450
WAR	54.8	13.6

Francisco Lindor’s full profile →Luis Robert Jr.’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Francisco Lindor vs

Luis Robert Jr. vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.