Head to head · 2026 batting

Francisco Lindor vs Corey Seager

In 2026 Francisco Lindor has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Their 2026 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.

Francisco Lindor NYM

Corey Seager TEX

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Corey Seager
G	104	101
PA	469	436
H	94	87
HR	21	20
RBI	49	51
SB	3	2
AVG	.225	.227
OBP	.309	.312
SLG	.423	.424
OPS	.733	.736
ISO	.199	.198
BB%	9.8%	10.3%
K%	20.3%	23.6%
wOBA	.324	.321
wRC+	105	105
WAR	2.5	1.9

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Corey Seager
G	41	78
PA	179	346
H	41	76
HR	8	19
RBI	21	48
BB	20	42
SO	42	79
SB	2	3
AVG	.263	.254
OBP	.348	.350
SLG	.474	.508
OPS	.823	.858

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Francisco Lindor	Corey Seager
G	1,639	1,229
PA	7,317	5,323
H	1,758	1,341
2B	351	286
3B	30	13
HR	300	241
RBI	905	718
BB	634	518
SO	1,215	978
SB	219	23
AVG	.270	.284
SLG	.472	.503
WAR	54.8	45.5

Francisco Lindor’s full profile →Corey Seager’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Francisco Lindor vs

Corey Seager vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.