Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Xander Bogaerts vs Garrett Mitchell
In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Xander Bogaerts | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 15 | 16 |
| H | 2 | 4 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 1 |
| BB | 2 | 1 |
| SO | 3 | 6 |
| SB | 0 | 1 |
| AVG | .154 | .267 |
| OBP | .267 | .313 |
| SLG | .154 | .400 |
| OPS | .421 | .713 |
| Statistic | Xander Bogaerts | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 60 | 15 |
| PA | 242 | 59 |
| H | 51 | 10 |
| HR | 7 | 3 |
| RBI | 23 | 7 |
| BB | 23 | 7 |
| SO | 49 | 21 |
| SB | 1 | 1 |
| AVG | .235 | .192 |
| OBP | .306 | .288 |
| SLG | .387 | .404 |
| OPS | .693 | .692 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Xander Bogaerts | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 153 | 144 |
| PA | 606 | 531 |
| H | 120 | 121 |
| HR | 13 | 11 |
| RBI | 57 | 65 |
| SB | 22 | 14 |
| AVG | .231 | .262 |
| OBP | .332 | .354 |
| SLG | .344 | .416 |
| OPS | .676 | .771 |
| ISO | .113 | .154 |
| BB% | 12.7% | 11.3% |
| K% | 18.0% | 31.5% |
| wOBA | .309 | .343 |
| wRC+ | 97 | 117 |
| WAR | 2.9 | 3.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Xander Bogaerts | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1,810 | 277 |
| PA | 7,675 | 974 |
| H | 1,942 | 220 |
| 2B | 402 | 51 |
| 3B | 19 | 9 |
| HR | 210 | 24 |
| RBI | 895 | 105 |
| BB | 670 | 105 |
| SO | 1,379 | 317 |
| SB | 148 | 37 |
| AVG | .283 | .259 |
| SLG | .438 | .424 |
| WAR | 50.1 | 6.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

