Head to head · 2026 NLCS batting

Mookie Betts vs Garrett Mitchell

In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLCS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 4-0 over the Los Angeles Dodgers.

Mookie Betts LAD

Garrett Mitchell MIL

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLCS.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	Garrett Mitchell
G	4	4
PA	18	17
H	3	2
HR	0	2
RBI	0	2
BB	3	3
SO	2	6
SB	0	0
AVG	.200	.143
OBP	.333	.294
SLG	.200	.571
OPS	.533	.866

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	Garrett Mitchell
G	99	15
PA	455	59
H	98	10
HR	8	3
RBI	42	7
BB	56	7
SO	67	21
SB	16	1
AVG	.250	.192
OBP	.343	.288
SLG	.383	.404
OPS	.726	.692

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	Garrett Mitchell
G	123	144
PA	528	531
H	123	121
HR	23	11
RBI	69	65
SB	2	14
AVG	.257	.262
OBP	.326	.354
SLG	.454	.416
OPS	.780	.771
ISO	.197	.154
BB%	8.9%	11.3%
K%	11.0%	31.5%
wOBA	.340	.343
wRC+	115	117
WAR	3.1	3.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Mookie Betts	Garrett Mitchell
G	1,646	277
PA	7,464	974
H	1,890	220
2B	419	51
3B	41	9
HR	314	24
RBI	982	105
BB	783	105
SO	982	317
SB	198	37
AVG	.288	.259
SLG	.508	.424
WAR	58.8	6.3

Mookie Betts’s full profile →Garrett Mitchell’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Mookie Betts vs

Garrett Mitchell vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.