Head to head · 2026 batting

José Ramírez vs Kyle Tucker

So far in 2026 Kyle Tucker has been worth 0.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

José Ramírez CLE

Kyle Tucker LAD

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	José Ramírez	Kyle Tucker
G	118	146
PA	516	601
H	105	121
HR	12	17
RBI	51	70
SB	34	11
AVG	.234	.235
OBP	.322	.334
SLG	.373	.394
OPS	.695	.729
ISO	.138	.159
BB%	11.2%	12.8%
K%	13.0%	17.0%
wOBA	.306	.327
wRC+	90	106
WAR	1.7	2.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	José Ramírez	Kyle Tucker
G	1,634	911
PA	6,995	3,759
H	1,707	869
2B	414	183
3B	40	24
HR	295	164
RBI	983	560
BB	709	440
SO	832	600
SB	311	130
AVG	.277	.267
SLG	.500	.489
WAR	54.2	25.1

José Ramírez’s full profile →Kyle Tucker’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

José Ramírez vs

Kyle Tucker vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.