Head to head · 2026 batting
Jake Bauers vs Matt Chapman
In 2026 Jake Bauers has been worth 3.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Matt Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| G | 144 | 84 |
| PA | 578 | 352 |
| H | 127 | 72 |
| HR | 26 | 7 |
| RBI | 86 | 42 |
| SB | 11 | 0 |
| AVG | .266 | .235 |
| OBP | .389 | .324 |
| SLG | .484 | .368 |
| OPS | .874 | .692 |
| ISO | .218 | .134 |
| BB% | 16.3% | 10.5% |
| K% | 27.0% | 23.0% |
| wOBA | .384 | .311 |
| wRC+ | 145 | 97 |
| WAR | 4.4 | 1.1 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Matt Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| G | 21 | 6 |
| PA | 78 | 26 |
| H | 15 | 6 |
| HR | 3 | 0 |
| RBI | 10 | 1 |
| BB | 11 | 3 |
| SO | 25 | 5 |
| SB | 1 | 0 |
| AVG | .227 | .273 |
| OBP | .346 | .346 |
| SLG | .394 | .318 |
| OPS | .740 | .664 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jake Bauers | Matt Chapman |
|---|---|---|
| G | 743 | 1,226 |
| PA | 2,540 | 5,122 |
| H | 487 | 1,073 |
| 2B | 100 | 271 |
| 3B | 7 | 24 |
| HR | 84 | 210 |
| RBI | 297 | 607 |
| BB | 321 | 553 |
| SO | 725 | 1,341 |
| SB | 50 | 35 |
| AVG | .223 | .240 |
| SLG | .391 | .452 |
| WAR | 6.2 | 28.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

