Head to head · 2026 ALDS batting
Cody Bellinger vs Richie Palacios
In 2026 Cody Bellinger has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Cody Bellinger | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 3 | 3 |
| PA | 12 | 10 |
| H | 1 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 0 | 0 |
| SO | 2 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .083 | .200 |
| OBP | .083 | .200 |
| SLG | .083 | .300 |
| OPS | .167 | .500 |
| Statistic | Cody Bellinger | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 80 | 10 |
| PA | 319 | 32 |
| H | 61 | 8 |
| HR | 11 | 0 |
| RBI | 41 | 4 |
| BB | 27 | 0 |
| SO | 95 | 8 |
| SB | 14 | 1 |
| AVG | .210 | .258 |
| OBP | .276 | .258 |
| SLG | .375 | .355 |
| OPS | .650 | .613 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Cody Bellinger | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 132 | 122 |
| PA | 562 | 399 |
| H | 132 | 81 |
| HR | 17 | 10 |
| RBI | 73 | 57 |
| SB | 12 | 17 |
| AVG | .266 | .235 |
| OBP | .340 | .330 |
| SLG | .431 | .374 |
| OPS | .771 | .704 |
| ISO | .165 | .139 |
| BB% | 10.5% | 11.5% |
| K% | 15.8% | 17.0% |
| wOBA | .340 | .319 |
| wRC+ | 111 | 100 |
| WAR | 2.4 | 1.7 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Cody Bellinger | Richie Palacios |
|---|---|---|
| G | 1,283 | 313 |
| PA | 5,327 | 988 |
| H | 1,234 | 204 |
| 2B | 236 | 36 |
| 3B | 31 | 3 |
| HR | 242 | 22 |
| RBI | 768 | 107 |
| BB | 528 | 111 |
| SO | 1,046 | 175 |
| SB | 116 | 44 |
| AVG | .261 | .238 |
| SLG | .478 | .364 |
| WAR | 29.3 | 3.6 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

