Head to head · 2026 batting
Luis Arraez vs Luke Keaschall
In 2026 Luke Keaschall has been worth 0.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
2026 season
| Statistic | Luis Arraez | Luke Keaschall |
|---|---|---|
| G | 151 | 152 |
| PA | 655 | 620 |
| H | 185 | 149 |
| HR | 6 | 10 |
| RBI | 64 | 52 |
| SB | 10 | 20 |
| AVG | .310 | .282 |
| OBP | .345 | .374 |
| SLG | .419 | .407 |
| OPS | .765 | .781 |
| ISO | .109 | .125 |
| BB% | 5.2% | 9.5% |
| K% | 4.3% | 14.0% |
| wOBA | .333 | .351 |
| wRC+ | 113 | 125 |
| WAR | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Luis Arraez | Luke Keaschall |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | — |
| PA | 70 | — |
| H | 15 | — |
| HR | 0 | — |
| RBI | 1 | — |
| BB | 2 | — |
| SO | 5 | — |
| SB | 1 | — |
| AVG | .224 | — |
| OBP | .246 | — |
| SLG | .284 | — |
| OPS | .530 | — |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Luis Arraez | Luke Keaschall |
|---|---|---|
| G | 989 | 201 |
| PA | 4,188 | 827 |
| H | 1,213 | 204 |
| 2B | 202 | 42 |
| 3B | 25 | 4 |
| HR | 42 | 14 |
| RBI | 372 | 80 |
| BB | 264 | 78 |
| SO | 243 | 116 |
| SB | 41 | 34 |
| AVG | .316 | .287 |
| SLG | .414 | .417 |
| WAR | 19.9 | 5.7 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.