Head to head · 2026 batting

Ramón Laureano vs Kyle Stowers

So far in 2026 Kyle Stowers has been worth 1.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Ramón Laureano SD

Kyle Stowers MIA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ramón Laureano	Kyle Stowers
G	53	117
PA	206	497
H	37	103
HR	7	19
RBI	21	61
SB	7	1
AVG	.203	.237
OBP	.286	.327
SLG	.374	.446
OPS	.660	.773
ISO	.170	.209
BB%	9.7%	10.1%
K%	31.6%	32.0%
wOBA	.294	.336
wRC+	87	115
WAR	0.3	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Ramón Laureano	Kyle Stowers
G	779	339
PA	3,047	1,294
H	682	283
2B	154	62
3B	13	10
HR	113	50
RBI	349	169
BB	222	119
SO	827	399
SB	79	6
AVG	.250	.247
SLG	.440	.449
WAR	13.3	4.8

Ramón Laureano’s full profile →Kyle Stowers’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ramón Laureano vs

Kyle Stowers vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.