Head to head · 2026 batting

Trevor Larnach vs Nathaniel Lowe

So far in 2026 Trevor Larnach has been worth 0.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trevor Larnach MIN

Nathaniel Lowe CIN

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trevor Larnach	Nathaniel Lowe
G	122	117
PA	433	412
H	103	94
HR	13	17
RBI	48	59
SB	2	0
AVG	.269	.255
OBP	.352	.323
SLG	.436	.454
OPS	.788	.777
ISO	.167	.198
BB%	10.4%	9.0%
K%	18.2%	23.8%
wOBA	.350	.338
wRC+	124	117
WAR	1.9	1.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trevor Larnach	Nathaniel Lowe
G	563	954
PA	2,093	3,842
H	455	890
2B	96	159
3B	5	13
HR	65	124
RBI	246	472
BB	214	413
SO	523	934
SB	12	15
AVG	.247	.263
SLG	.410	.427
WAR	4.6	14.2

Trevor Larnach’s full profile →Nathaniel Lowe’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trevor Larnach vs

Nathaniel Lowe vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.