DataBaseball
2026

Head to head · 2026 batting

Trevor Larnach vs Nathaniel Lowe

In 2026 Trevor Larnach has been worth 0.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
StatisticTrevor LarnachNathaniel Lowe
G122123
PA433429
H10396
HR1317
RBI4864
SB20
AVG.269.252
OBP.352.317
SLG.436.444
OPS.788.761
ISO.167.192
BB%10.4%8.9%
K%18.2%23.1%
wOBA.349.330
wRC+124111
WAR1.91.2

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
StatisticTrevor LarnachNathaniel Lowe
G—32
PA—125
H—24
HR—3
RBI—11
BB—12
SO—34
SB—0
AVG—.212
OBP—.288
SLG—.327
OPS—.615

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
StatisticTrevor LarnachNathaniel Lowe
G563960
PA2,0933,859
H455892
2B96159
3B513
HR65124
RBI246477
BB214414
SO523935
SB1215
AVG.247.262
SLG.410.426
WAR4.614.0

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.