Head to head · 2026 batting

Trent Grisham vs Rhys Hoskins

So far in 2026 Trent Grisham has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Grisham NYY

Rhys Hoskins CLE

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Rhys Hoskins
G	120	95
PA	484	317
H	88	47
HR	18	13
RBI	59	38
SB	9	1
AVG	.211	.179
OBP	.308	.306
SLG	.395	.376
OPS	.703	.682
ISO	.184	.198
BB%	12.6%	14.8%
K%	18.4%	31.5%
wOBA	.314	.308
wRC+	93	91
WAR	1.6	0.1

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Rhys Hoskins
G	861	982
PA	3,315	4,039
H	616	797
2B	125	188
3B	14	8
HR	122	199
RBI	379	568
BB	402	526
SO	818	1,029
SB	59	21
AVG	.217	.233
SLG	.399	.468
WAR	13.9	17.2

Trent Grisham’s full profile →Rhys Hoskins’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Grisham vs

Rhys Hoskins vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.