Head to head · 2026 batting
Trent Grisham vs Seiya Suzuki
In 2026 Seiya Suzuki has been worth 2.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Seiya Suzuki |
|---|---|---|
| G | 120 | 143 |
| PA | 484 | 634 |
| H | 88 | 147 |
| HR | 18 | 26 |
| RBI | 59 | 86 |
| SB | 9 | 3 |
| AVG | .211 | .270 |
| OBP | .308 | .368 |
| SLG | .395 | .473 |
| OPS | .703 | .841 |
| ISO | .184 | .204 |
| BB% | 12.6% | 12.8% |
| K% | 18.4% | 24.4% |
| wOBA | .314 | .368 |
| wRC+ | 93 | 134 |
| WAR | 1.6 | 3.9 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Seiya Suzuki |
|---|---|---|
| G | 31 | 10 |
| PA | 125 | 40 |
| H | 17 | 9 |
| HR | 3 | 3 |
| RBI | 7 | 5 |
| BB | 13 | 2 |
| SO | 43 | 12 |
| SB | 2 | 0 |
| AVG | .156 | .237 |
| OBP | .264 | .275 |
| SLG | .266 | .553 |
| OPS | .530 | .828 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Trent Grisham | Seiya Suzuki |
|---|---|---|
| G | 861 | 673 |
| PA | 3,315 | 2,899 |
| H | 616 | 683 |
| 2B | 125 | 142 |
| 3B | 14 | 18 |
| HR | 122 | 113 |
| RBI | 379 | 382 |
| BB | 402 | 316 |
| SO | 818 | 719 |
| SB | 59 | 39 |
| AVG | .217 | .269 |
| SLG | .399 | .472 |
| WAR | 13.9 | 15.4 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

