Head to head · 2026 batting

Trent Grisham vs Kyle Schwarber

So far in 2026 Kyle Schwarber has been worth 1.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Trent Grisham NYY

Kyle Schwarber PHI

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Kyle Schwarber
G	120	149
PA	484	669
H	88	131
HR	18	45
RBI	59	95
SB	9	3
AVG	.211	.235
OBP	.308	.352
SLG	.395	.513
OPS	.703	.864
ISO	.184	.278
BB%	12.6%	14.5%
K%	18.4%	32.3%
wOBA	.314	.372
wRC+	93	131
WAR	1.6	3.5

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Trent Grisham	Kyle Schwarber
G	861	1,439
PA	3,315	6,053
H	616	1,181
2B	125	193
3B	14	15
HR	122	385
RBI	379	879
BB	402	861
SO	818	1,743
SB	59	40
AVG	.217	.231
SLG	.399	.502
WAR	13.9	33.2

Trent Grisham’s full profile →Kyle Schwarber’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Trent Grisham vs

Kyle Schwarber vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.