Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting

Luis Campusano vs Garrett Mitchell

In 2026 Garrett Mitchell has been worth 1.5 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 NLDS, where the Milwaukee Brewers won 3-1 over the San Diego Padres.

Luis Campusano SD

Garrett Mitchell MIL

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 NLDS.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Garrett Mitchell
G	3	4
PA	10	16
H	2	4
HR	0	0
RBI	1	1
BB	2	1
SO	2	6
SB	0	1
AVG	.250	.267
OBP	.400	.313
SLG	.250	.400
OPS	.650	.713

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Garrett Mitchell
G	5	15
PA	15	59
H	3	10
HR	0	3
RBI	1	7
BB	2	7
SO	3	21
SB	0	1
AVG	.231	.192
OBP	.333	.288
SLG	.231	.404
OPS	.564	.692

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Garrett Mitchell
G	71	144
PA	248	531
H	57	121
HR	8	11
RBI	30	65
SB	0	14
AVG	.265	.262
OBP	.363	.354
SLG	.433	.416
OPS	.795	.771
ISO	.167	.154
BB%	12.1%	11.3%
K%	21.4%	31.5%
wOBA	.356	.343
wRC+	131	117
WAR	1.8	3.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Garrett Mitchell
G	244	277
PA	840	974
H	188	220
2B	33	51
3B	0	9
HR	25	24
RBI	107	105
BB	68	105
SO	150	317
SB	0	37
AVG	.247	.259
SLG	.389	.424
WAR	2.8	6.3

Luis Campusano’s full profile →Garrett Mitchell’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luis Campusano vs

Garrett Mitchell vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.