Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting

Luis Campusano vs Pete Crow-Armstrong

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 6.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Opponents in the 2026 Wild Card Series, where the San Diego Padres won 2-0 over the Chicago Cubs.

Luis Campusano SD

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Postseason

Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.

2026 Wild Card Series.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	1	2
PA	4	8
H	1	0
HR	0	0
RBI	0	0
BB	0	1
SO	0	4
SB	0	1
AVG	.250	.000
OBP	.250	.125
SLG	.250	.000
OPS	.500	.125

Every published postseason, batting, summed with the rates recomputed from the counts.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	5	10
PA	15	37
H	3	5
HR	0	0
RBI	1	3
BB	2	2
SO	3	16
SB	0	2
AVG	.231	.147
OBP	.333	.194
SLG	.231	.147
OPS	.564	.342

2026 season

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	71	162
PA	248	726
H	57	175
HR	8	45
RBI	30	107
SB	0	41
AVG	.265	.280
OBP	.363	.372
SLG	.433	.570
OPS	.795	.943
ISO	.167	.291
BB%	12.1%	11.4%
K%	21.4%	25.8%
wOBA	.356	.402
wRC+	131	157
WAR	1.8	8.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the season table.
Statistic	Luis Campusano	Pete Crow-Armstrong
G	244	448
PA	840	1,802
H	188	409
2B	33	81
3B	0	18
HR	25	86
RBI	107	250
BB	68	136
SO	150	447
SB	0	105
AVG	.247	.255
SLG	.389	.489
WAR	2.8	13.6

Luis Campusano’s full profile →Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luis Campusano vs

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.