Head to head · 2026 batting

Jake Burger vs Casey Schmitt

So far in 2026 Casey Schmitt has been worth 0.2 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Jake Burger TEX

Casey Schmitt SF

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Jake Burger	Casey Schmitt
G	148	97
PA	592	409
H	123	105
HR	26	21
RBI	86	55
SB	4	9
AVG	.232	.271
OBP	.306	.301
SLG	.423	.483
OPS	.728	.784
ISO	.191	.212
BB%	9.1%	2.7%
K%	27.0%	19.8%
wOBA	.321	.336
wRC+	104	113
WAR	1.5	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Jake Burger	Casey Schmitt
G	593	315
PA	2,312	1,147
H	516	258
2B	101	51
3B	5	2
HR	114	44
RBI	324	141
BB	143	55
SO	623	254
SB	7	11
AVG	.244	.244
SLG	.457	.420
WAR	7.3	2.9

Jake Burger’s full profile →Casey Schmitt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Jake Burger vs

Casey Schmitt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.