Head to head · 2026 batting

Kyle Higashioka vs Casey Schmitt

So far in 2026 Casey Schmitt has been worth 1.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Kyle Higashioka TEX

Casey Schmitt SF

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Casey Schmitt
G	53	97
PA	186	409
H	36	105
HR	7	21
RBI	18	55
SB	0	9
AVG	.218	.271
OBP	.306	.301
SLG	.370	.483
OPS	.676	.784
ISO	.152	.212
BB%	10.2%	2.7%
K%	25.3%	19.8%
wOBA	.305	.336
wRC+	93	113
WAR	0.6	1.7

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Kyle Higashioka	Casey Schmitt
G	512	315
PA	1,699	1,147
H	343	258
2B	66	51
3B	2	2
HR	75	44
RBI	231	141
BB	105	55
SO	437	254
SB	5	11
AVG	.218	.244
SLG	.406	.420
WAR	4.3	2.9

Kyle Higashioka’s full profile →Casey Schmitt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Kyle Higashioka vs

Casey Schmitt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.