Head to head · 2026 batting

Michael Harris II vs Casey Schmitt

In 2026 Michael Harris II has been worth 2.6 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Michael Harris II ATL

Casey Schmitt SF

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Casey Schmitt
G	155	97
PA	621	409
H	174	105
HR	26	21
RBI	87	55
SB	12	9
AVG	.294	.271
OBP	.321	.301
SLG	.491	.483
OPS	.812	.784
ISO	.196	.212
BB%	3.7%	2.7%
K%	19.2%	19.8%
wOBA	.350	.336
wRC+	120	114
WAR	4.4	1.8

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Michael Harris II	Casey Schmitt
G	676	315
PA	2,712	1,147
H	713	258
2B	136	51
3B	16	2
HR	99	44
RBI	342	141
BB	108	55
SO	549	254
SB	82	11
AVG	.278	.244
SLG	.460	.420
WAR	16.3	3.0

Michael Harris II’s full profile →Casey Schmitt’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Michael Harris II vs

Casey Schmitt vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.