Head to head · 2026 Wild Card Series batting
Yordan Alvarez vs Sam Antonacci
In 2026 Yordan Alvarez has been worth 4.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Yordan Alvarez | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 2 | 2 |
| PA | 8 | 9 |
| H | 1 | 2 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 2 |
| BB | 0 | 1 |
| SO | 2 | 1 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .125 | .286 |
| OBP | .125 | .444 |
| SLG | .125 | .429 |
| OPS | .250 | .873 |
| Statistic | Yordan Alvarez | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 62 | 7 |
| PA | 260 | 27 |
| H | 64 | 5 |
| HR | 12 | 0 |
| RBI | 41 | 5 |
| BB | 31 | 2 |
| SO | 71 | 3 |
| SB | 0 | 0 |
| AVG | .288 | .250 |
| OBP | .385 | .407 |
| SLG | .536 | .300 |
| OPS | .921 | .707 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Yordan Alvarez | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 158 | 139 |
| PA | 692 | 557 |
| H | 179 | 133 |
| HR | 42 | 8 |
| RBI | 106 | 48 |
| SB | 1 | 20 |
| AVG | .316 | .277 |
| OBP | .432 | .370 |
| SLG | .601 | .396 |
| OPS | 1.033 | .766 |
| ISO | .286 | .119 |
| BB% | 15.8% | 7.7% |
| K% | 17.3% | 14.7% |
| wOBA | .430 | .348 |
| wRC+ | 182 | 122 |
| WAR | 7.5 | 3.2 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Yordan Alvarez | Sam Antonacci |
|---|---|---|
| G | 835 | 139 |
| PA | 3,559 | 557 |
| H | 907 | 133 |
| 2B | 190 | 25 |
| 3B | 7 | 4 |
| HR | 212 | 8 |
| RBI | 599 | 48 |
| BB | 455 | 43 |
| SO | 686 | 82 |
| SB | 10 | 20 |
| AVG | .300 | .277 |
| SLG | .578 | .396 |
| WAR | 31.9 | 3.2 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

