Head to head · 2026 batting

Ha-Seong Kim vs Bryson Stott

So far in 2026 Bryson Stott has been worth 3.4 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Ha-Seong Kim ATL

Bryson Stott PHI

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Ha-Seong Kim	Bryson Stott
G	41	148
PA	128	579
H	14	128
HR	0	10
RBI	9	65
SB	2	25
AVG	.123	.250
OBP	.219	.325
SLG	.132	.390
OPS	.350	.715
ISO	.009	.140
BB%	10.2%	9.7%
K%	25.8%	17.1%
wOBA	.180	.320
wRC+	3	96
WAR	-0.8	2.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Ha-Seong Kim	Bryson Stott
G	622	716
PA	2,295	2,816
H	472	644
2B	85	122
3B	8	15
HR	52	59
RBI	226	299
BB	235	238
SO	444	472
SB	86	124
AVG	.235	.255
SLG	.363	.385
WAR	9.0	12.6

Ha-Seong Kim’s full profile →Bryson Stott’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Ha-Seong Kim vs

Bryson Stott vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.