Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Mike Trout

In 2026 CJ Abrams has been worth 0.9 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Mike Trout LAA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Mike Trout
G	152	142
PA	654	634
H	151	124
HR	33	22
RBI	106	54
SB	34	11
AVG	.261	.242
OBP	.336	.382
SLG	.497	.421
OPS	.834	.803
ISO	.237	.179
BB%	8.7%	16.9%
K%	24.2%	26.0%
wOBA	.359	.358
wRC+	123	134
WAR	5.3	4.4

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Mike Trout
G	673	1,297
PA	2,807	5,642
H	641	1,306
2B	134	240
3B	23	29
HR	92	328
RBI	316	765
BB	171	905
SO	579	1,339
SB	150	123
AVG	.252	.283
SLG	.431	.562
WAR	17.0	63.8

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Mike Trout’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Mike Trout vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.