Head to head · 2026 batting

CJ Abrams vs Otto Lopez

In 2026 the two have been worth the same 5.3 wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

CJ Abrams WSH

Otto Lopez MIA

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Otto Lopez
G	152	157
PA	654	687
H	151	191
HR	33	11
RBI	106	71
SB	34	34
AVG	.261	.305
OBP	.336	.349
SLG	.497	.437
OPS	.834	.786
ISO	.237	.132
BB%	8.7%	5.8%
K%	24.2%	13.0%
wOBA	.359	.345
wRC+	123	121
WAR	5.3	5.3

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	CJ Abrams	Otto Lopez
G	673	417
PA	2,807	1,726
H	641	440
2B	134	76
3B	23	10
HR	92	32
RBI	316	190
BB	171	110
SO	579	248
SB	150	69
AVG	.252	.278
SLG	.431	.399
WAR	17.0	8.9

CJ Abrams’s full profile →Otto Lopez’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

CJ Abrams vs

Otto Lopez vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.