Head to head · 2026 batting
Corbin Carroll vs Francisco Lindor
In 2026 Corbin Carroll has been worth 1.0 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
- Both among the 25 most valuable hitters of 2025 by dbWAR.
- Both near the front of the 2025 NL MVP race: among the league's 8 most valuable hitters by dbWAR.
- Their 2025 seasons were among each other's nearest on rate statistics.
2026 season
| Statistic | Corbin Carroll | Francisco Lindor |
|---|---|---|
| G | 156 | 104 |
| PA | 671 | 469 |
| H | 139 | 94 |
| HR | 22 | 21 |
| RBI | 78 | 49 |
| SB | 21 | 3 |
| AVG | .239 | .225 |
| OBP | .328 | .309 |
| SLG | .467 | .423 |
| OPS | .795 | .733 |
| ISO | .229 | .199 |
| BB% | 10.9% | 9.8% |
| K% | 22.5% | 20.3% |
| wOBA | .344 | .324 |
| wRC+ | 119 | 105 |
| WAR | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Corbin Carroll | Francisco Lindor |
|---|---|---|
| G | 17 | 41 |
| PA | 78 | 179 |
| H | 18 | 41 |
| HR | 2 | 8 |
| RBI | 10 | 21 |
| BB | 9 | 20 |
| SO | 13 | 42 |
| SB | 5 | 2 |
| AVG | .273 | .263 |
| OBP | .364 | .348 |
| SLG | .409 | .474 |
| OPS | .773 | .823 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Corbin Carroll | Francisco Lindor |
|---|---|---|
| G | 638 | 1,639 |
| PA | 2,757 | 7,317 |
| H | 609 | 1,758 |
| 2B | 126 | 351 |
| 3B | 60 | 30 |
| HR | 104 | 300 |
| RBI | 326 | 905 |
| BB | 278 | 634 |
| SO | 590 | 1,215 |
| SB | 144 | 219 |
| AVG | .253 | .270 |
| SLG | .485 | .472 |
| WAR | 19.0 | 54.8 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

