Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Brandon Lowe

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 4.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Brandon Lowe PIT

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Brandon Lowe
G	162	150
PA	726	656
H	175	152
HR	45	35
RBI	107	96
SB	41	2
AVG	.280	.260
OBP	.372	.331
SLG	.570	.493
OPS	.943	.824
ISO	.291	.233
BB%	11.4%	9.5%
K%	25.8%	28.8%
wOBA	.402	.356
wRC+	157	121
WAR	8.7	4.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Brandon Lowe
G	448	893
PA	1,802	3,650
H	409	809
2B	81	155
3B	18	13
HR	86	192
RBI	250	542
BB	136	344
SO	447	1,006
SB	105	35
AVG	.255	.250
SLG	.489	.483
WAR	13.6	23.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Brandon Lowe’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Brandon Lowe vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.