Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs Miguel Vargas

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.1 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

Miguel Vargas CWS

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Miguel Vargas
G	162	159
PA	726	704
H	175	147
HR	45	33
RBI	107	93
SB	41	22
AVG	.280	.250
OBP	.372	.363
SLG	.570	.474
OPS	.943	.837
ISO	.291	.224
BB%	11.4%	14.3%
K%	25.8%	17.9%
wOBA	.402	.366
wRC+	157	135
WAR	8.7	5.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	Miguel Vargas
G	448	466
PA	1,802	1,864
H	409	354
2B	81	86
3B	18	7
HR	86	62
RBI	250	209
BB	136	222
SO	447	357
SB	105	35
AVG	.255	.221
SLG	.489	.400
WAR	13.6	6.8

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →Miguel Vargas’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

Miguel Vargas vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.