Head to head · 2026 batting

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs James Wood

In 2026 Pete Crow-Armstrong has been worth 3.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Pete Crow-Armstrong CHC

James Wood WSH

2026 batting. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	James Wood
G	162	135
PA	726	623
H	175	136
HR	45	30
RBI	107	77
SB	41	21
AVG	.280	.265
OBP	.372	.388
SLG	.570	.503
OPS	.943	.891
ISO	.291	.238
BB%	11.4%	16.4%
K%	25.8%	28.7%
wOBA	.402	.386
wRC+	157	141
WAR	8.7	5.0

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Pete Crow-Armstrong	James Wood
G	448	371
PA	1,802	1,648
H	409	367
2B	81	81
3B	18	5
HR	86	70
RBI	250	212
BB	136	226
SO	447	497
SB	105	50
AVG	.255	.261
SLG	.489	.475
WAR	13.6	10.5

Pete Crow-Armstrong’s full profile →James Wood’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Pete Crow-Armstrong vs

James Wood vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.