Head to head · 2026 NLDS batting
Jackson Merrill vs Garrett Mitchell
In 2026 Jackson Merrill has been worth 0.3 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.
Postseason
Box-score figures only: October is kept out of the season constants, so there is no wOBA, FIP or dbWAR for it.
| Statistic | Jackson Merrill | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 4 | 4 |
| PA | 17 | 16 |
| H | 3 | 4 |
| HR | 0 | 0 |
| RBI | 0 | 1 |
| BB | 0 | 1 |
| SO | 6 | 6 |
| SB | 1 | 1 |
| AVG | .176 | .267 |
| OBP | .176 | .313 |
| SLG | .176 | .400 |
| OPS | .353 | .713 |
| Statistic | Jackson Merrill | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 16 | 15 |
| PA | 64 | 59 |
| H | 16 | 10 |
| HR | 2 | 3 |
| RBI | 9 | 7 |
| BB | 5 | 7 |
| SO | 16 | 21 |
| SB | 2 | 1 |
| AVG | .281 | .192 |
| OBP | .333 | .288 |
| SLG | .474 | .404 |
| OPS | .807 | .692 |
2026 season
| Statistic | Jackson Merrill | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 157 | 144 |
| PA | 664 | 531 |
| H | 156 | 121 |
| HR | 26 | 11 |
| RBI | 87 | 65 |
| SB | 27 | 14 |
| AVG | .254 | .262 |
| OBP | .303 | .354 |
| SLG | .440 | .416 |
| OPS | .743 | .771 |
| ISO | .186 | .154 |
| BB% | 6.2% | 11.3% |
| K% | 24.1% | 31.5% |
| wOBA | .322 | .343 |
| wRC+ | 106 | 117 |
| WAR | 3.6 | 3.3 |
Career
Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2005 begins at 2005, not at his real first game.
| Statistic | Jackson Merrill | Garrett Mitchell |
|---|---|---|
| G | 425 | 277 |
| PA | 1,740 | 974 |
| H | 434 | 220 |
| 2B | 82 | 51 |
| 3B | 17 | 9 |
| HR | 66 | 24 |
| RBI | 244 | 105 |
| BB | 103 | 105 |
| SO | 369 | 317 |
| SB | 44 | 37 |
| AVG | .270 | .259 |
| SLG | .465 | .424 |
| WAR | 11.3 | 6.3 |
More head to heads
The same seasons, measured against somebody else.
wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.

