Head to head · 2026 batting

Luke Keaschall vs Josh Naylor

So far in 2026 Luke Keaschall has been worth 2.7 more wins. Both lines are computed from play-by-play on the same constants, so they are measured the same way rather than quoted from two sources.

Luke Keaschall MIN

Josh Naylor SEA

2026 batting, season in progress. The stronger figure in each row is highlighted — for strikeout rate that is the lower one.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Josh Naylor
G	146	145
PA	594	620
H	141	154
HR	9	10
RBI	46	54
SB	19	29
AVG	.278	.270
OBP	.370	.325
SLG	.387	.361
OPS	.757	.686
ISO	.108	.091
BB%	9.4%	6.8%
K%	14.3%	12.4%
wOBA	.343	.307
wRC+	119	96
WAR	3.3	0.6

Career

Totalled over the seasons published here, which is not the same as a whole career: a player who debuted before 2015 begins at 2015, not at his real first game.

Career batting totals. AVG and SLG are recomputed from the components rather than averaged; OBP, wOBA and wRC+ need each season’s own constants and are left to the table above.
Statistic	Luke Keaschall	Josh Naylor
G	195	888
PA	801	3,483
H	196	851
2B	40	168
3B	1	2
HR	13	114
RBI	74	489
BB	75	263
SO	114	534
SB	33	84
AVG	.284	.269
SLG	.402	.432
WAR	5.1	10.2

Luke Keaschall’s full profile →Josh Naylor’s full profile →

More head to heads

The same seasons, measured against somebody else.

Luke Keaschall vs

Josh Naylor vs

How these are computed

wOBA uses linear weights measured from this season’s own play-by-play rather than published constants, and wRC+ is park-adjusted against that same league. dbWAR is our own open implementation — not fWAR or bWAR — and the full derivation, including its simplifications, is on the methodology page. To put these two beside a third, the comparison page takes up to four.